ART Migration Appeals

The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) reviews migration decisions made by the Department of Home Affairs. If your visa application has been refused or cancelled, you may have the right to seek independent review.

Overview

The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) is an independent body that reviews migration decisions made by the Department of Home Affairs. If your visa application has been refused or your visa has been cancelled, you may have the right to seek review of that decision at the ART.

The ART replaced the former Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and Migration Review Tribunal (MRT) for migration matters. It provides a fresh opportunity to have your case considered by an independent decision-maker.

Review at the ART is not a simple appeal — it is a reconsideration of your case on its merits. The Tribunal can consider new evidence and information that was not before the original decision-maker.

Types of Decisions Reviewed

The ART reviews a wide range of migration decisions, including:

Visa refusals

If your visa application has been refused, you may be able to apply for review of that decision. This includes refusals of skilled visas, partner visas, visitor visas, and many other visa categories.

Visa cancellations

If your visa has been cancelled, you may have the right to seek review. The grounds for cancellation and the type of cancellation will determine your review rights.

Sponsor-related decisions

Decisions relating to sponsorship approvals and nominations may also be reviewable in certain circumstances.

Other migration decisions

Various other decisions made under the Migration Act, including decisions about bridging visas and certain character-related matters, may be subject to review.

Not all decisions are reviewable. The Migration Act specifies which decisions can be reviewed and who has standing to apply. Our lawyers can advise whether you have review rights.

The Review Process

The ART review process provides an opportunity to present your case before an independent Tribunal member.

Lodging an application

Applications for review must be lodged within strict time limits. The time limit depends on the type of decision and your location when the decision was made. Missing the deadline generally means losing your right to review.

Case preparation

After lodging, you have the opportunity to provide additional evidence and submissions to support your case. The Tribunal will also have access to the Department's file on your matter.

Hearing

In most cases, the Tribunal will invite you to attend a hearing. This is your opportunity to present your case in person, respond to any concerns, and provide oral evidence. Hearings are generally conducted in person or by video.

Decision

After considering all the evidence, the Tribunal will make a decision. The Tribunal can affirm the original decision, set it aside and substitute a new decision, or remit the matter to the Department for reconsideration.

Time Limits

Strict time limits apply to ART applications. Missing the deadline will generally result in losing your right to review.

Standard time limits

The time limit for most migration decisions is 21 days from when you received the decision, if you were in Australia when the decision was made. Different time limits may apply depending on the circumstances.

Decisions made while overseas

If you were outside Australia when the decision was made, different time limits may apply. These are generally longer than for decisions made while you were in Australia.

Extensions of time

The Tribunal has limited power to extend time limits in migration matters. In most cases, if you miss the deadline, you will not be able to apply for review.

It is critical to seek advice as soon as you receive an unfavourable decision to understand your options and ensure any application is lodged in time.

While you can represent yourself at the ART, legal representation can significantly improve your prospects of success.

Why representation matters

Migration law is complex, and the issues in your case may involve technical legal questions. A lawyer can identify the relevant issues, gather appropriate evidence, and present arguments effectively to the Tribunal.

Preparation and evidence

Proper preparation is essential. This includes identifying what evidence is needed, obtaining supporting documents, and presenting your case in the most effective way.

Hearing advocacy

At the hearing, your lawyer can make submissions, respond to the Tribunal's concerns, and ensure your case is presented in the best possible light.

Understanding the decision

If the Tribunal decision is not in your favour, your lawyer can advise on further options, including whether judicial review may be available.

How We Can Assist

We provide legal representation for ART migration matters, from initial advice through to hearing and decision.

Our services include:

  • Assessing your review rights and prospects of success
  • Lodging applications for review within the required time limits
  • Preparing comprehensive written submissions
  • Gathering and presenting supporting evidence
  • Representing you at Tribunal hearings
  • Advising on the decision and any further options

If you have received an unfavourable decision, contact us promptly to discuss your options. Time limits are strict, and early advice is important.

Frequently Asked Questions

The time limit is usually 21 days from when you received the decision, if you were in Australia. Different time limits may apply if you were overseas. It is critical to seek advice immediately after receiving an unfavourable decision.

Yes, the ART conducts a fresh review of your case and can consider new evidence and information that was not before the original decision-maker. This is one of the key advantages of merits review.

In most cases, the Tribunal will invite you to attend a hearing. While you can request a decision on the papers without a hearing, attending gives you the opportunity to present your case directly and respond to any concerns.

If the Tribunal affirms the decision, you may have the option to seek judicial review in the Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court. Judicial review examines whether there was a legal error in the decision-making process.

In many cases, lodging a valid application for review will allow you to remain in Australia on a bridging visa while the matter is being considered. However, this depends on your circumstances and visa history.

Received an Unfavourable Decision?

Time limits for ART applications are strict. Contact us promptly to discuss your review options and ensure your application is lodged in time.